Zendata × IAM

Overview

Identity Risk Matrix

🔍 Signal Drill-Down

Risk Scenarios

Entitlement Usage

⬡ Machine Identities

Identities

0 human · 0 machine

AI Events

365-day window

Tokens

~$0 est. cost

Critical Events

ZD ≥ 75 + hijacked

PII Events

SSN · salary · account

Compromised Agents

none

Zendata Behavioral Risk vs IAM Risk — All Identities

Human Machine / Agent ZD Critical (≥85)

Token Spend by Department

Active Risk Alerts

Risk Classification

Critical

High

Medium

Low

The Zendata gap: IAM provisions identities with static, infrequently-reviewed risk scores. Behavioral telemetry from the Zendata SDK measures what each identity actually does — surfacing drift, PII exposure, hijack attempts, and over-privileged service accounts that classical IAM never sees.

Identity	Type	Department	Role	IAM Risk	ZD Risk	Gap	Events	PII	Classification

Select an identity to see its full signal history, score evolution, and classification path.

🔍

Select an identity from the dropdown above to inspect its signal history, score trajectory, and classification evolution.

Entitlement Usage — Top Roles

Machine Identities

0 normal · 0 implicated

Agent Events

0% of total telemetry

Critical Agents

ZD ≥ 85 + hijacked

High-Risk Agents

ZD 65–84

Takeover Alerts

behavioral signal

Machine / Service Agent Inventory